Model 1: Pollution [35 marks]

In fluid dynamics, we use the term convection to refer to the transfer of fluid in a system due to its motion. We can use an ordinary differential equation to model the transport within the system of such fluids (e.g. water, gasoline) or substances dissolved in these fluids (e.g. salt, oxygen, pollutants), by modelling the change in the amount of fluid (or substance) with respect to time as the balance between inflowing and outflowing fluid. One application of such models is to study the environmental impact of large chemical spills, caused by industrial accidents, in order to manage them better.

Suppose that due to an environmental accident, polluted water starts to flow into a lake of volume   at a constant flowrate  Water leaves this lake through a channel at a constant flowrate  The concentration of pollutant in the incoming water is  The change in the amount of pollutant y deposited in this lake as a function of time t is given by a differential equation of the type:

a) [15%] Derive a mathematical model for the amount of pollutant () [kg] deposited in the lake as a function of time by solving the differential equation above. Use dimensional analysis to show your model is dimensionally correct.

b) [15%] Knowing that this lake’s ecosystem will be irreversibly damaged when the concentration of pollutant reaches 331 g  derive an expression for the total time that local authorities have to take action on this issue from the moment pollution starts flowing into this lake. Support your answer with a graph.

c) [40%] Derive a mathematical expression for the time  it takes until the concentration of pollutant in the lake,  reaches 95% of its steady state concentration given by:

Indicate what the region of steady state concentration is in a plot of  By analysing the curve for  describe what is a steady state regime in your own words. Discuss how the lake’s volume and the balance between  and  affect the time that it takes for the concentration of pollutant in the lake to reach steady state.

d) [30%] If local authorities act quickly enough and pollution into the lake is stopped when the pollutant concentration in the lake is at 213 g  calculate how long it will take for the lake to clear out and have pollutant concentrations < 5 g  Design a mathematical model for the clearing of the lake and support your answer with a graph.

Guidance for questions asking for a graph:

You will need to assume values for  and . You can use your experience of Fermi problems in Week 2 to help you make reasonable assumptions. Here are some hints for plotting your graph:

• Think about how  and  affect the volume of the lake . This question will be significantly easier if you assume that  is constant. You might need to establish a connection between  and .

• When choosing a value for , choose a value below 1000 kg 

• You might need to plot  for large time intervals. As a reference, if  and , plotting  only becomes informative for a time interval from 0 to  hours on a linear scale, and 0 to  hours on a logarithmic scale on the horizontal axis.

• In letters (b) and (d) your graph needs to show the relationship between the pollution concentration given by  and time t , highlighting the relevant points for each question.

Model 2: Decay [25 marks]

Carbon dating is a type of radioactive dating that allows us to date matter that was once living. The radioactive isotope carbon-14 is produced at relatively constant rate in the atmosphere, and like the stable carbon-12, combines with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, which exists in all living things. When an organism dies, its level of carbon-12 remains constant, but the levels of carbon-14 decay with rate

where r is a constant in . We know that the initial condition is .

a) [30%] If it takes 5730 years for the levels of carbon-14 in a sample to drop by half, use equation 1 to show that .

The fraction of carbon-14 to carbon-12 remains relatively constant in living organisms, so we can determine how long an organism has been dead by measuring this ratio and determining how much carbon-14 has radiated away. Researchers usually measure this ratio in units of modern carbons M = . In a living organism, M = 1 (this is our initial condition).

b) [40%] Express E.1 in terms of M, and solve for M.

One of the major applications for carbon dating is in studying human evolution and the development of civilisations by providing a chronological timeframe for archaeological findings. One such important recent finding was the discovery of the oldest Homo sapiens remains in Europe.

This particular individual is of even greater interest as it was determined he had a recent Neanderthal ancestry, making dating when he lived with a good degree of accuracy important for our understanding of how Homo sapiens migrated from Africa to Eurasia. To this end, five measurements of M were made in Oxford and Groningen, yielding the results:

TABLE 1. MEASUREMENT DATA.

c) [30%] You are required to use this data to estimate the 95% confidence interval of when this individual lived. Notice you will find a time period dating from when the individual passed away to when the measurements were taken.

Model 3: Uncertainty [40 marks]

In practice, many engineering systems, processes or projects can be affected by random events, whose nature and incidence are difficult to predict. For example, construction projects can be delayed by work restrictions imposed by a global pandemic, mass-produced machined parts can have defects at random intervals, and transport delays can be caused by unforeseen accidents. The more complex engineering systems are, the greater degree of uncertainty is associated with their behaviour. Our understanding of how such systems behave relies on data acquisition and statistics for making inferences and predictions.

In this model you will be required to demonstrate your data analysis abilities and statistical knowledge to better understand and manage air travel.

Part 1.

The data in Table 2 shows the 2019 annual punctuality statistics of flights leaving London Heathrow with destination to China, according to the 2019 report from the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) [1]. This table shows a discrete approximation of the probability that flights from Heathrow via certain airlines will arrive either early or late at their destination.

a) [10%] At which Chinese airports flights arriving from Heathrow are more likely to be early than late? Support your answer with numeric evidence.

b) [15%] Suppose that you work at the UK CAA. You are asked to rank the airline flights arriving at Shanghai Pu-Dong airport (that departed from Heathrow) in terms of their punctuality. Show how early/late flights from each airline are expected to be and present a numerical measure of the reliability of your predictions.

Part 2.

Passengers landing at Heathrow airport need to go through passport control checks in order to enter the UK. EU and UK nationals use a fast-track system, where they scan their passport at a self-service station, where queue times average 20 minutes with 5 minutes standard deviation. Non-UK/EU nationals need to have their passports checked by the UK Border Force, a process that is often longer, with queue times averaging 30 minutes and approximately 15 minutes standard deviation.

The rate of change of the number of passengers queueing within the borders of Heathrow airport for passport control can be approximated as:

where  is a random variable representing the number of passengers arriving at Heathrow per hour,  is a random variable representing the number of passengers that have gone through passport control per hour, and  is a random variable representing the number of transit passengers.

In more detail, the random variable  can be modelled as:

where  is the number of staffed gates open for overseas passengers and  is the number of passengers a certain gate can service per hour. Similarly,  is the number of gates open for UK/EU nationals, and  is the rate of passengers going through that gate per hour. Table 3 shows a monthly breakdown of the nationalities of passengers arriving at London Heathrow airport throughout 2019, and Table 4 shows the total number of terminal and transit passengers at London airports in 2019.

a) [5%] Find a suitable approximation for the number of transit passengers  at the airport. Show the mean and variance of this random variable.

b) [35%] Estimate the number of gates that need to be open in order to ensure the queues of passengers waiting to go through passport control does not increase with time. Use the data in the tables provided alongside realistic estimates for the rate at which passengers go through the two types of passport control gates (Home/Overseas). You can use your experience of Fermi problems in Week 2 to help you make reasonable assumptions.

c) [35%] Build a mathematical model to predict how passport control queues change as a function of the number and type of tills open. Consider the uncertainty of your model. Based on your model, recommend a till opening strategy for the airport.

TABLE 2. PUNCTUALITY STATISTICS FOR FLIGHTS LEAVING HEATHROW AND LANDING IN CHINA (2019).



% Early % Late
Destination City  
Airline  
22 min
7 min
8 min
23 min
46 min
91 min
151 min
271 min
450 min
BEIJING  
AIR CHINA  
14.03 32.04
28.72
11.12
8.95
3.72
0.75
0.20
0.45
BEIJING  
BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC  
22.32
21.47
33.39
11.07
5.96
3.92
1.19
0.34
0.34
BEIJING DAXING INT AIRPORT  
BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC  
9.30
21.71
39.53
12.40
6.98
5.43
3.88
0.00
0.78
GUANGZHOU BAIYUN INT  
CHINA SOUTHERN  
24.03
43.49
17.82
7.39
5.04
1.64
0.23
0.23
0.12
CHANGSHA HUANGHUA INT AIRPORT  
HAINAN AIRLINES  
12.59
39.12
30.61
9.52
5.10
0.68
1.36
0.68
0.34
CHENGDU  
AIR CHINA  
11.74
31.30
26.52
13.91
8.70
3.91
0.00
0.43
3.48
QINGDAO  
BEIJING CAPITAL AIRLINES  
30.08
42.37
11.86
7.63
4.66
1.27
0.42
0.00
1.69
SHANGHAI (PU DONG)  
BRITISH AIRWAYS PLC  
9.12
31.91
36.97
10.80
6.54
2.97
0.50
0.40
0.79
SHANGHAI (PU DONG)  
CHINA EASTERN AIRLINES  
5.80
30.39
30.80
14.09
12.02
5.66
0.69
0.41
0.14
SHANGHAI (PU DONG)  
VIRGIN ATLANTIC LTD  
13.32
33.93
33.52
8.65
6.59
2.47
0.96
0.27
0.27
SHENZHEN (HUANGTIAN)  
SHENZHEN AIRLINES  
7.57
26.50
28.71
15.14
13.56
6.62
0.95
0.00
0.95
TIANJIN  
TIANJIN AIRLINES  
12.24
32.78
18.88
12.03
12.24
3.73
0.21
0.00
7.88
WUHAN TIANHE INT  
CHINA SOUTHERN  
17.31
42.63
17.95
6.09
9.29
5.45
0.96
0.32
0.00
ZHENGZHOU XINZHENG  
CHINA SOUTHERN  
4.00
36.00
17.00
16.00
20.00
7.00
0.00
0.00
0.00

TABLE 3. HEATHROW MONTHLY TRAFFIC STATISTICS BY NATIONALITY (2019).

Month 
UK
EU
Non-EU Europe
Africa
North America
Latin America
Middle East
Asia / Pacific
Total
January 2019  
326,386
1,817,088
426,466
313,497
1,277,923
121,749
628,759
1,015,675
5,927,543
February 2019  
320,861
1,859,085
418,782
273,567
1,088,818
106,026
541,573
873,576
5,482,288
March 2019  
391,467
2,217,166
487,150
303,704
1,470,992
114,644
597,277
945,089
6,527,489
April 2019  
419,327
2,319,492
480,811
301,144
1,557,547
112,837
677,609
929,445
6,798,212
May 2019  
435,701
2,404,663
445,300
261,598
1,706,145
113,709
518,061
883,726
6,768,903
June 2019  
431,711
2,536,137
504,697
280,538
1,807,271
116,985
607,953
961,305
7,246,597
July 2019  
446,608
2,689,689
552,150
302,642
1,833,961
122,240
746,174
1,060,675
7,754,139
August 2019  
437,054
2,619,533
535,723
312,796
1,829,388
121,380
790,105
1,034,348
7,680,327
September 2019  
388,187
2,333,969
469,720
277,583
1,615,711
109,523
643,594
938,828
6,777,115
October 2019  
432,183
2,420,621
478,882
292,290
1,677,327
114,544
643,064
1,005,868
7,064,779
November 2019  
414,684
2,090,235
422,161
284,821
1,416,945
111,486
613,100
880,369
6,233,801
December 2019  
396,168
2,153,470
471,837
310,426
1,552,509
117,139
743,168
951,362
6,696,079

TABLE 4. HEATHROW TERMINAL AND TRANSIT PASSENGERS STATISTICS OVER A YEAR (2019).

Airport  
Total Passengers
Terminal
Transit
GATWICK  
46576473
46574786
1687
HEATHROW  
80890031
80886589
3442
LONDON CITY  
5122271
5122271
0
LUTON  
18216207
18213901
2306
SOUTHEND  
2035535
2035535
0
STANSTED  
28124292
28124292
0