Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit

ENV315 Reflection (50% of final mark)

2024-2025 Semester I

Learning outcomes:

A evaluate different research approaches 

D identify common pitfalls in research

E contribute to a productive discussion of a research paper

F self-reflect how reading, reviewing and discussions changes the understanding of the content and quality of a research paper

Assignment description

As an integral part of our course, you are required to produce a series of reflection essays spanning weeks 2 through 13. The reflection essays, combined, will account for 50% of your total grade for this course. Currently, the plan is for 12 essays. If there's any change in the number, the grading will be prorated accordingly. Each of your reflection essays will be graded on a scale of 0-100.

These essays will be centered around the critiques and discussions from Monday’s scientific paper and Friday's seminars. By reflecting on these discussions, you'll gain a deeper understanding and a revised perspective on the papers you've reviewed. Each essay should be at least 500 words but no longer than 2 pages, all single-spaced. There is no format requirement for this assignment.

Submission Guidelines:

Guidelines Common Science topic reflection

· List the topic addressed

· Explain why this is an important topic

· Summarize the main points addressed in class

· List what you knew about this topic before class

· Addressed what you learned about this topic

· List any questions/topics unanswered or not addressed in class or that you noticed while writing this reflection

· This is weeks common science topic an issue in this week’s or previous weeks papers?

Guidelines Paper Reflection

· Go back to your paper critique and reread it.

· Based on the class discussion, identify what you missed in the merits and flaws of the paper

· Modify your overall assessment based on your reflection

· Did you notice any of the common science research issues discussed in class in this paper? If so which issues are present in this paper?

· Go back to your Friday paper critique and reread the paper.
· Based on the class discussion, identify what you missed in the merits and flaws of the paper
· Modify your overall review based on your reflection

· Did you notice any of the common science research issues discussed in class in this paper? If so which issues are present in this paper?

Specific submission deadlines will be announced during class sessions and will also be available on the Learning Mall. For clarity, each essay's submission deadline is set for the following Monday 11:00 AM after the Friday seminar.

Should you submit your reflection essay after the specified deadline, a 5% deduction (from the total marks available, i.e., 100) will be applied for each working day it's late, capped at a maximum of five working days. If unforeseen circumstances arise and you believe you need an extension, please reach out to the module leader as soon as possible before the deadline.

Please upload your completed reflection essays to the Learning Mall platform. Ensure that the file name consists solely of your student ID number for easy identification. The marking criteria are provided.

The marking criteria are detailed in the following table:

 

Knowledge and Understanding (40%)

Intellectual Skills (40%)

Transferable Skills (20%)

100%

The best answer that could reasonably be expected from a student at that level of study under the prevailing conditions (i.e., exam or coursework)

90-99%

‘Outstanding’

Total coverage of the task set. Exceptional demonstration of knowledge and understanding appropriately grounded in theory and relevant literature.

Extremely creative and imaginative approach. Comprehensive and accurate analysis. Well-argued conclusions. Perceptive self-assessment.

Extremely clear exposition. Excellently structured and logical answer. Excellent presentation, only the most insignificant errors

 

80-89%

‘Excellent’

 

As ‘Outstanding’ but with some minor weaknesses or gaps in knowledge and understanding.

As ‘Outstanding’ but slightly less imaginative and with some minor gaps in analysis and/or conclusions

As ‘Outstanding’ but with some minor weaknesses in structure, logic and/or presentation.

 

70-79%

‘Very Good’

 

Full coverage of the task set. Generally very good demonstration good, you got most of it. But write more of a reflection, on what you knew about this before class and what your of knowledge and understanding but with some modest gaps. Good grounding in theory.

Some creative and imaginative features. Very good and generally accurate analysis. Sound conclusions. Some self-assessment.

 

Generally clear exposition. Satisfactory structure. Very good presentation, largely free of grammatical and other errors.

 

60-69%

‘Comprehensive’

 

As ‘Very Good’ but with more and/or more significant gaps in knowledge & understanding and some significant gaps in grounding

As ‘Very Good’ but analysis and conclusions contain some minor weaknesses.

 

As ‘Very Good’ but with some weaknesses in exposition and/or structure and a few more grammatical and other errors.

 

50-59%

‘Competent’

 

Covers most of the task set. Patchy knowledge and understanding with limited grounding in literature.

 

Rather limited creative and imaginative features. Patchy analysis containing significant flaws. Rather limited conclusions. No self-assessment.

Competent exposition and structure. Competent presentation but some significant grammatical and other errors.

 

40-49%

‘Adequate’

 

As ‘Competent’ but patchy coverage of the task set and more weaknesses and/or omissions in knowledge and understanding. Just meets the threshold level.

 

As ‘Competent’ but probably without much imagination. Shows barely adequate ability to analyse and draw conclusions. Just meets the threshold level.

 

As ‘Competent’ but with more weaknesses in exposition, structure, presentation and/or errors. Just meets the threshold level.

 

35-39%

Compensable fail’

 

Some parts of the set task likely to have been omitted. Major gaps in knowledge and understanding. Some significant confusion. Very limited grounding. Falls just short of the threshold level.

No creative or imaginative features. Analysis and conclusions rather limited. Falls just short of the threshold level.

 

Somewhat confused and limited exposition. Confused structure. Some weaknesses in presentation and some serious grammatical and other errors. Falls just short of the threshold level.

 

20-34%

‘Deficient’

 

As ‘Compensable Fail’ but with major omissions and/or major gaps in knowledge and understanding. Falls substantially below the threshold level.

As ‘Compensable Fail’ but analysis and/or conclusions may have been omitted. Falls substantially below the threshold level.

 

As ‘Compensable Fail’ but with more serious weaknesses in presentation and/or grammar. Falls substantially below the threshold level.

 

0-20%

‘Extremely

weak’

 

Substantial sections of the task not covered. Knowledge & understanding very limited and/or largely incorrect. No grounding in theory.

No creative or imaginative features. Analysis extremely weak or omitted. No conclusions.

 

Largely confused exposition and structure. Many serious grammatical and other errors.

 

Awarded Marks

 

 

 

Final Mark:

Total mark:

Deduction for Word-count =

Deduction for Lateness =

 

Final mark =        / 100