Sustainable Finance I: Foundations of ESG Investing (INAF 6690) Homework Assignment 2
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
Sustainable Finance I: Foundations of ESG Investing (INAF 6690)
Homework Assignment 2
Due: April 21, 2025 by 4pm EST.
Please note:
• Do the homework on your own or in a 3-student team.
• Please include relevant figures and tables in your homework writeup, and please cite all references.
• Submit your answers through the “Assignments” tab on Courseworks. You need onIy submit one copy of the assignment per group. Indicate on the cover page the names of the people in the group.
• Make sure that the main writeup you submit is formatted for easy printing.
In this homework we will analyze company-level carbon emissions with the goal of building “green” portfoIios. We have discussed ESG data at length in our class, and this will also be your chance to get hands-on experience with a variety of climate-related data at the level of individual companies. Working with data is often messy, and the assignment is designed to expose you to some of such challenges, for example imputing missing data or merging with information you will need to obtain from external sources. You are free to use any software package of your choice — but you also can complete the homework entirely in Excel.
1. There are a range of “standard” measures of climate exposure (e.g., carbon intensity, carbon emissions, scope 1,2,3 etc.), many of which we have/will have discussed in class. Propose an alternative measure of a company’s the environmental footprint and explain how an analyst may be collect the requisite data to potentially use it in practice. Ideally come up with your own idea here — if not, please review climate measures from ESG data vendors and discuss an example measure other than the ones we covered in class.
2. The ESG dataset provided for this homework (homework 2 data.xlsx) gives you a realistic example of what such data looks like in practice. Notice that various carbon emissions metrics are missing for some firms. Explain how you are going to deal with the missing data carbon intensity data (do not worry about other missing data) and adjust the data accordingly.
Notice: this will affect your estimates in the next parts of the assignment. If you have no ideas as to how to impute the missing observations, simply delete the rows with missing carbon intensity data. This will cost you points for this part of the homework, but you can still get full score for the subsequent questions.
3. For this part of the exercise) we wiII work with scope 1+2 (you’II need to sum up scope 1 and scope 2 data to arrive at this variable) and scope 3 emissions. Calculate the mean and standard deviation of carbon intensity, carbon emissions in tons, and ESG and E scores within each sector. What conclusions can you draw? Are the results in line with what you would expect?
(Note the data does not give you carbon emissions in tons. You will need to impute this data on your own, based on the information provided.)
4. For the next questions, we will work with scope 1+2 emissions only (you’re free to experiment with scope 3 emissions on your own if you wish) .
Consider a $1M portfolio invested in the MSCI World index, one of the major stock market indexes used by investors. Compute the Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (WACI), portfolio- level carbon intensity, and the carbon footprint of this portfolio.
(Compute the carbon footprint based on what fraction of each stock’s market capitalization you hold in the portfolio – in other words, we are not going to use the enterprise value for this calculation.)
5. For this question, we will focus on the Weighted Average Carbon Intensity (WACI), again using scope 1+2 emissions. Calculate what fraction of stocks make up 50%, 75%, 90% of index-level emissions for MSCI World. Are these concentrated in specific sectors or countries, and do the names you would expect show up?
6. Build a portfolio that screens out the 10% of companies with the highest individual scope 1+2 emissions intensity. This portfolio holds the remaining stocks, weighted as in the MSCI World index (note you will need to re-scale the weights to 100%). What is the WACI of this portfolio?
7. Briefly discuss the pros and cons of the screening approach in 6 as a way to build a low carbon portfolio. If you wanted to apply tilting instead, how would you go about this and what would you expect the results to look like? (No need to calculate anything here, just briefly describe your approach.)
8. Companies increasingly commit to decarbonization, possibly all the way to net zero. SBTi assesses the quality/credibility of these commitments. Obtain data on SBTi-validated commitments (hint: check their website) and merge this data with the rest of the data provided in this homework based on the ISIN (ISIN is a common security identifier that is useful in merging financial data).
What fraction of companies have an SBTi-validated commitment? What fraction of MSCI World index weight are in such companies? Comment on the patterns by sector and by region or country. Are there any striking absences (few commitments in a group of companies you consider important for climate)? Why?
(Hint: To do the merge, you can use Excel’s VLOOKUP function, or you can do this in another piece of software such as Stata. In principle you could do this manually as well, but frankly that’s a waste of time: learning how to use VLOOKUP will be faster and you’ll gain a useful skill in the process.)
9. Climate exposure and carbon emissions are some of the inputs into MSCI Environmental scores. Estimate the correlation between the scope 1+2 carbon intensities and each firm's Environmental pillar score. Also look at MSCI E scores for companies with/without SBTi commitments. Comment for the patterns you see.
2025-04-17