Excellent (81%-100%)

Good (61%-80%)

Meet Expectations (50%-60%)

Below Expectations to Fail (0%-49%)

Summarise and Analyse

(30 points)

You have clearly identi-  fied and comprehensively analysed the results and implications.

You have identified and appropriately analysed the results and implica- tions.

You have analysed the  relevant results and im- plications.

Better analysis would enhance your discus- sion.

Provide recom-

mendations to

the Board

(30 points)

You have provided in-     sightful, realistic and       convincing policy rec-     ommendations for the     Board to consider. There

is a very clear connection between your results, in- terpretation, and your     recommendations.

You have provided use- ful and relevant pol-     icy recommendations.

There is some connec- tion between your re-  sults, interpretation,    and your recommenda- tions.

You have provided    some potentially use- ful policy recommen- dations for the Board to consider. Most of  recommendations are

useful, but lacking con- nection to the results   and interpretation.

Your recommendations often reflect a discon-   nect with the results    and interpretation. Be- cause of this, it will be difficult for the Board  to use your policy rec- ommendations.

Communication (40 points)

The video presentation    provides a comprehen-    sive summary and is log- ically structured. Main   points are clearly empha- sized, effectively placed   and presented.

The video presenta-      tion is conventionally    structured. Main points are apparent, suitably   placed and presented.

The video presenta-       tion is structured. Main points can be deduced   but are not always ap-  parent. Placement and  presentation of points    do not interfere with     understanding.

The video presentation is loosely structured.   Main points are not     always clear. Place-     ment and presentation of points sometimes     interfere with under-   standing.