A1. Visual Advertising Strategy Evaluation – Individual Report [CLO1, CLO3, CLO4]
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
A1. Visual Advertising Strategy Evaluation – Individual Report [CLO1, CLO3, CLO4]
Week 4 Thursday (June 22) 3 PM / Weighting: 20% / Length: Max 900 words
Description
This assessment provides the opportunity to critically evaluate and discuss a visual advertising strategy.
Companies or influencers change their visual advertising strategies over time. However, advertising content managers largely rely on their gut feeling rather than quantifying the changes using objective numeric measures. As a result, they often don’t know what they have changed and whether the changes are effective. Your job is to evaluate the changes in a visual advertising strategy using colour features. You are also required to present and discuss your findings.
Details
Follow the below steps to complete your task:
1) Colour Usage: Divide the data into two periods. Use the cut-off date as 2019 January 1st (i.e., period 1: before the cut-off date, period 2: since the cut-off date). Measures colour features (Colorfulness, Saturation, Contrast, Clarity, Brightness, and Warm Hue) for each image using OpenCV, which you learned during the tutorial. Report summary statistics (count/frequency, mean, median, minimum, maximum) in a table for each color feature at each period. Also, do a visual comparison of each colour feature by choosing proper plots to see how each color feature has changed between the two periods.
2) Colour Effectiveness: Identity which color features increase viewer engagement significantly in each period. To do so, run a regression with Y = the log (like count + 1) for each period, respectively. X variables include the above colour features and control variables about posting time: Year, Month-of-Year (January, …, December), Day-of-Week (Monday, ..., Sunday),
Time-of-day (Morning, Afternoon, Evening, Night). Interpret the regression result.
3) Colour Strategy Evaluation:
(a) Provide related advertising posts (screenshots of both image and text description part)
from your current Instagram data to support your regression results of period 1 in the above task 2. For example, to demonstrate whether higher or lower values of color features are better, you could compare two posts in period 1 (e.g., below or above the median value of each color feature, respectively) that have different “like count” .
(b) Then, based on the result of period 1 in task 2, evaluate whether the change (or no change)
between the two periods for each color feature in task 1 was proper.
(c) Based on the result of periods 1&2, recommend effective color strategies for your company. Also, provide related advertising posts to support your arguments.
In completing this task, apply appropriate data analytics and consider the concepts introduced in class. Make sure that your discussion component is logical, clearly structured, and professionally presented. Your report should not exceed the word limit, excluding the title page, relevant images, tables or charts.
Title page (1 page) includes (1) the Title of your report, (2) the Word count, (3) the Course name, tutorial session and group, tutor’s name, (4) Your first and last name & zID
Submission instructions
A. Submit your report to Turnitin via Moodle.
1) .doc contains your report. File name: Tutorial session_Group_ your first and last name & zID _A1.doc” (e.g., W12_1_Junbum Kwon_zXXXXX_A1.doc)
B. Submit other supporting files (data, image, paper and code) to Moodle submission folder.
2) .xlsx file contains the dataset on which you run a regression.
3) .ipynb contains all relevant code to get the results in your report. Make a zip file by combining all colab files.
● For each missing file among the above (1) to (3), -1 mark
Marking Criteria
Your assignment will be marked based on the following marking criteria:
1. Analysis: Quality of advertising data image analytics
2. Interpretation & Recommendations: Quality of interpretation and argumentation
3. Written Presentation: Quality of written report
For further information, see the below marking rubric.
Marking Rubric for Assessment 1: Visual Advertising Strategy Evaluation – Individual Report
Criteria
|
%
|
Fail
|
Pass
|
Credit
|
Distinction
|
High Distinction
|
Analysis |
40% |
Analysis of |
Sufficient analysis of the |
Proper analysis of the |
Effective and proper analysis of |
Highly effective and proper analysis |
Quality of |
|
advertising data |
advertising data, which |
advertising data, which |
the advertising data, which |
of the advertising data, which |
advertising image |
|
analytics does not |
measures colour |
mostly accurately measures |
accurately measures and |
accurately measures, and compares |
data analytics |
|
meet the required |
features. Attempts |
and compares colour |
compares colour features for |
colour features for each image; |
|
|
standard. |
summary statistics and |
features for each image; |
each image; accurately |
clearly and accurately presents |
|
|
|
regression analysis. |
presents summary statistics in an appropriate format. Attempts regression analysis. |
presents summary statistics in an appropriate format. Does regression analysis and |
summary statistics in an appropriate format; Does regression analysis and interprets its result properly. |
|
|
|
|
|
interprets its results.
|
|
Interpretation & |
40% |
Interpretation of |
Sufficient interpretation |
Data is mostly accurately |
Data is accurately interpreted |
Data is accurately and meaningfully |
of data with some
conclusions drawn.
Recommendations are
provided, but not all are
appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
and course concepts. |
course concepts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
structured with excellent transitions and paragraphs. Excellent and above standard use of written English language, which is professional and appropriate to the task and has no spelling and/or grammatical errors. Report adheres to the prescribed word count and conventions.
2023-06-17