FIT1050 Web Fundamentals 2023 Semester 1 Assignment 1
Hello, dear friend, you can consult us at any time if you have any questions, add WeChat: daixieit
FIT1050 Web Fundamentals
2023 Semester 1
Assignment 1 Marking Guidelines
Presentation Video
Tutors will be assessing all of the following criteria when marking submissions for this assignment task. All criteria are equally weighted.
|
Overview of website and target audience goals |
A brief overview of the chosen website has been provided. |
Demographic attributes are used to define audience. |
Specific and realistic user goals are described. |
|
Application of network analysis technique |
Correct network analysis settings and methods have been used. |
Demonstrated understanding of network analysis results. |
Objective and subjective opinion of whether loading time is acceptable. |
|
Identification of issues and possible improvements |
Factors that impact loading are based on evidence from network analysis. |
Improvements show understanding of both bandwidth and latency. |
Summary of issues and improvements considers context of user goals. |
|
Preparation and use of visual aids |
Slide content is understandable and concise with tidy design and layout. |
Images are used to support important parts of the spoken delivery. |
Research beyond the chosen website, references clearly listed on final slide. |
|
Quality of presentation delivery |
Spoken delivery has good pacing and timing (5mins). |
Spoken delivery is clear and engaging, not just read directly from slides. |
Recorded video is appropriately optimised for web streaming. |
Assessment Policy and Penalties
1. Each day, or part thereof, an assessment task is overdue, a late penalty of 10% of the available total marks applies up to a maximum of seven days.
2. Assessment tasks submitted more than seven days after the due date will receive a mark of zero for that task and may not receive feedback.
Extensions and other individual alterations to the assessment will only be considered in accordance with Monash Special Consideration Policy. Students should carefully read the Special Consideration website, including information about acceptable circumstances for special consideration and acceptable types of supporting documentation.
Understanding Your Results and Feedback
Each criteria in this assessment task will be assessed on a scale of Poor to Excellent with consideration of the following attributes.
● Quantity of work
Where the brief specifies a word-count or specific number of deliverables.
● Quality of work
We expect work to be clearly presented, sensibly structured, and well-formatted.
● Application of theory
You must demonstrate an understanding of theory covered in lectures and labs.
Excellent (80% - 100%)
● All deliverables are present, and complete to a high standard.
● A nuanced understanding of theory is applied supported with independent research.
● All work is structured and formatted professionally, consistent across all deliverables.
Very Good (70% - 79%)
● All deliverables are present, and complete to a fair standard.
● A deeper understanding of the theory is shown and applied to unique ideas.
● The work is presented well, but not entirely consistent.
Good (60% - 69%)
● All deliverables are present, but implementation of some parts is incorrect.
● A basic understanding of theory is present, recalling facts from unit content.
● Individual deliverables are free of major issues, but structure could be improved or formatting could have better consistency.
Satisfactory (50% - 59%)
● A minor deliverable is missing, or some deliverables are incomplete.
● Formal theory from the unit has been mentioned but is vague or used incorrectly.
● An attempt has been made to structure and format the work, but it is not easy to interpret or is unprofessional.
Poor (0% - 49%)
● Significant number of deliverables missing.
● Work is messy and unstructured, lacking in formatting.
● Formal theory has not been applied, or is barely mentioned.
2023-03-21